Dependent variable vs name of function

'How to use this template Start by describing the bottleneck in the Section Description of Bottleneck. If you like you can orient yourself on the bottleneck description From Derivative to Proportionality. If you feel able to turn the bottleneck into a (positive) learning outcome, please do also describe the intended learning outcome. This wiki also serves to connect people interested in certain bottlenecks. If you wish to make yourself known as interested, fill in your name under People interested in this Bottleneck. When done editing, save page. When in reading mode, add suitable tags/categories by pressing the tag symbol on the top of the page. For instance, if the bottleneck is in connection to biology, add "biology" as a tag. Edit once again and delete the whole Section How to use this Template and save your changes.

Description of bottleneck

In mathematics and in particual in the STEM disciplines one often does not symbolically distinguish the name of a function and its dependent variable.

For example, the time dependence (independent variable, symbolized by $t$) of an electrical charge $q$ (dependent variable, symbolized by $q$) might be described by a certain function $f(t)$, i.e. $q=f(t)$. Here different symbols have been used for the dependent variable $q$ and the functional relationship $f$ (between $t$ and </q>). It is, however, customary to conflate this and to use $q$ to do denote both dependent variable and functional relationship. This results in the using the experession $q(t)$.

Interestingly this possible Bottleneck was revealed during an Decoding interview on students' difficulties with describing piecewise defined functions. The interviewers got confused by interviewees simultaneous usage of a symbol as the independent variable of a function and as the name of the functional relation.

People interested in this bottleneck

Peter Riegler